Sunday, May 8, 2011

prezi presentation reflection

I enjoyed working with the electronic space of a prezi. The program is similar to PowerPoint, but more elaborate. Instead of being separate, distinct slides, as in PowerPoint, appearing to the viewer individually in a strict linear sequence, the Prezi is designed on a single, flat design board. We were able to apply various colors and types of text, pictures, and videos as in PowerPoint, but the main difference is the motion the prezi possesses. It doesn’t simply change from one slide to the next, but glides across the plane, smoothly from one point to the next.
 
This transition technique more closely mocks our own natural thought process: more scattered and uncertain, than linear. With a prezi you never quite know where the focus is going to stop. This presentation technique can make the thought process of those presenting visible to the audience. It better constitutes the lines of communication because of its more natural conversational flow, as opposed to a planned out, ordered feel of a PowerPoint. We were able to show how points are related via their proximity and position in relation to each other. We were also able show the paths between thoughts and how they twist and intermingle to ultimately form one solid argument.
 
After viewing our classmates post of our prezi I discovered the prezi to have been very effective.  Many of them had our exact point and argument or our presentation nailed. Because of our success there is little I would change about our project.  One thing I would change would have to be how long we spent on the project.  With the very few days worth of effort we put in to it, it would be amazing what we could do with several more days to explore the application. I look forward to using prezi again in the future, either in the classroom or the real world.

chapter 3 prezi

Observe:
This chapter is on hypertext, clickable text on internet pages.  Hyperlinks are used to transport the reader to a different page on the same topic.  They show relationships between pages and make up the web, connecting layers and layers of pages.
Infer:
The main point of the prezi is that reading in an electronic system is challenging to decipher, and hypertext is one tool used to make that process easier. This argument suggests that hypertexts are beneficial because they are more similar to the way we think. They allow reading to be less linear and more “tree-like” and can easily jump to another page, or tangent, on a specific part of the main page’s information. The point it, though they take practice to know how to navigate with them and can be a bit distracting, they are still a useful tool that will continue to help shape the internet.  This is relevant to our lives today because the internet is an important tool and by learning about various parts of it we will be able to navigate it more easily and get the most out of it that we can. 
Question:
Do hyperlinks give us more or less control over our browsing? Why?
How do hyperlinks help with the organization of the internet?
Is it possible for all text online to be hypertext in the future?

chapter 4 prezi

Observe:
This chapter is on the breakout of the visual and how images are taking over our world.  We see visuals more than text and even hyper-visuals more than hypertext.  This is especially obvious is how little text is in advertising compared to visuals.  Though text is not completely absent yet, there is debate over if it will be one day. There are already more electronic magazines than books, and even newspapers are getting a look more image based and similar to a webpage.
Infer:
The main point of the prezi is that in this day and age we see visual images way more than text.  This argument suggests that the world is changing from a place of text to a place of images. They allow reading to be less linear and more “tree-like” and can easily jump to another page, or tangent, on a specific part of the main page’s information. The point is, that soon visuals will take over text, at least when it comes to sending messages like email.  This is relevant to our lives today because we are living in a media age and need to be aware.  We need to know for future job hunting and even relationships what to use to connect with people better: the visual.
Question:
Why do you think visuals apply more to and connect better with people today?
How do advertisers play on our love of the visual?
With the visual so prevalent, why do most educators still insist on pushing text as the primary form of communication and assignments?

chapter 6 prezi

Observe:
This chapter is on the refashioning of dialogs and the difference between oral communication and textual communication.  It is also on how the spoken word is tied into text and how they both continue to develop and change.  The spoken word is directly related to text and both have contributed to the change from the early use of papyrus to today’s eBook.
Infer:
The main point of the prezi is studying the connection between textual communication and oral communication.  Their argument suggests that the spoken word and the written word both have positives and negatives, and both have changed over time. Plato used written word and had a harder time portraying his message because he couldn’t debate or defend his claim directly.  However, Socrates used spoken word and had a harder time keeping his message consistent as it was passed on by word of mouth person to person. The point is that both methods are connected and have changed the way we read, think, and create books.  This is relevant to our lives today because it is important to understand that different people communicate better in different ways.  This needs to be taken under consideration as we develop technology in the future, either to be used to communicate for the classroom or for one’s own social desires.
Question:
How is dialog a hybrid of both oral communication and written communication?
Why did David Bolter find dissatisfaction with linear arguments in Writing Space?
Why is it easier to “hoodwink” a listener rather than a reader?

Paper 4 [the end]

It’s just like Mrs. Jappel said in the first grade; “Samantha, treat others as you would like to be treated.” So I do. I write for a mirror. Every word, phrase, or sentence I think “what would I think if someone wrote this for me?” In a way this is similar to the “making it strange” editing technique we used in class to find information not described with enough detail.  I love and care for my reader, carefully stringing them along, taking care not to lose them along the way. I respect my reader, being careful not to bother them with pointless tangents or waste their time with misinformation. I attempt to connect with my reader, become something special to them and make them think I am writing for him or her personally.  I want my reader to feel the emotions I’m feeling, share my opinions I care about, and learn the information I’m teaching.  I want to consume the reader, make them me like that face looking back at me in the mirror.
            It is because I write for myself that while I care for the reader, I do not need them.  I would be perfectly content writing for myself, face looking back at me in the mirror.  Aside from pointless papers of pesky professors, in which no meaning is meant and no feelings are felt, writing is an art. Art should always be done for the self, not to please an audience.  Billy Collins writes about his nagging need for the reader in “Flight of the Reader.” He speaks of the reader as a “wild parrot digging [his or her] claws into my loud shirt.” He claims not to need the reader and denies having a “crush” on them, but finishes his poem implying these denials to be false.  I could never need the reader like Collins or I’d write in constant fear of disappointment. If I aim for people of the world to like me, I would over think every phrase, sentence or word.  It would lose the enjoyable feel of art to me.
            However, recently, more often than not, I’ve only written because I have to.  Most if not all of my writing is mundane, mandatory, academic writing.  I used to write for me, in a diary. Every nights I would splatter its pages with the days thoughts and feelings, maybe a poem or two.  I loved that diary and how it lifted the weight off my shoulders and onto its pages.  But as papers became longer and more frequent, I soon had less and less time to write for me.  Our dates turned from daily to weekly to monthly as slowly it became just another chore and obligation.  Writing classes and their old age style and format that have you writing about other people ideas instead of exploring your own had slowly sucked the love out of writing for me.  Until this class.
This class is much different than any writing classes that I have had in a very long time.  This was mainly because of how technology based the class was.  It encouraged us to venture out of the five paragraph, MLA formatted essays and into the world of blogs, prezis, and videos.  This allowed us to think more creatively and explore our own ideas in a different way.  This class also encouraged me to write more personally again.  We did more of exploring and explaining our own ideas instead of only writing about other people’s. We were given the opportunity to write more creatively and freeform, and even use “I” and other pronouns.  Over all, the class was fun and refreshing.  No one was afraid to make jokes or temporarily venture off topic and we still learned a great deal.
However, would I consider myself a writer again? Well, it depends on what you mean by “writer”.  Yes, I write assignments for class; I write my name on the top of the paper; I am even writing right now.  But I still would not consider myself a writer like Jacques Derrida.  I do not create images well on paper. I do not trick, tempt or move many people with what I have to say.  I do not wait anxiously for the opportunity to put the words tangled in my head onto paper. I am still a speaker, artist, or singer before I’m a writer.  But I am closer.  Writing assignments like this are much less painful and I struggle less to come up with the words to describe what is dancing around in my head.  So who knows, maybe one day I will be a writer, with the same passion as Derrida and the same fear of uprooting the balance of the world with my words.
Therefore, I would like to end this paper with a letter to those that will be just starting out:
Dear new students of WSC002 with Professor Lay,
            Good luck. I don’t mean that to be nearly as intimidating as it sounds. Do be warned though; This class is like a roller coaster ride. It is probably unlike any college class, especially writing, that you have taken so far. It is wild; shooting up and down and most of the time speeding out of control as you attempt to hang on.  Don’t be afraid though, because it is a blast.  Don’t get frazzled or intimidated by Professor Lay’s wild and highly amusing antics, throwing you still half confused into assignments.  It teaches you to jump into things you don’t always understand and work it out from the inside.  Don’t be alarmed by any random Rebecca Black lyrics, or if the writing proficiency exam gets compared to a rock and a lemon because that is probably not even in the top five weirdest things that will happen in class this semester. However, I do promise you this: You’ll be better by the end. Better at reading, understanding, problem solving, expressing, writing, and laughing.
            So, even though you won’t need it, good luck.
                                                                              Sincerely,
Sammy